🔗 Share this article

This talented musician continually felt the burden of her family heritage. As the offspring of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the most famous British musicians of the 1900s, Avril’s name was shrouded in the deep shadows of the past.

A World Premiere

Earlier this year, I reflected on these shadows as I prepared to produce the first-ever recording of her piano concerto from 1936. With its impassioned harmonies, expressive melodies, and valiant rhythms, this piece will provide audiences deep understanding into how the composer – a composer during war born in 1903 – envisioned her reality as a woman of colour.

Legacy and Reality

However about the past. One needs patience to adjust, to see shapes as they really are, to distinguish truth from misinterpretation, and I had been afraid to confront her history for a period.

I deeply hoped her to be her father’s daughter. To some extent, this was true. The idyllic English tones of Samuel’s influence can be observed in numerous compositions, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). Yet it suffices to review the headings of her parent’s works to see how he heard himself as both a champion of British Romantic style but a advocate of the Black diaspora.

At this point parent and child began to differ.

The United States evaluated Samuel by the mastery of his compositions as opposed to the his racial background.

Family Background

As a student at the renowned institution, Samuel – the son of a African father and a British mother – turned toward his African roots. When the poet of color the renowned Dunbar visited the UK in that era, the aspiring artist was keen to meet him. He composed this literary work as a composition and the next year used the poet’s words for a musical work, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral work that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an international hit, especially with Black Americans who felt vicarious pride as the majority assessed his work by the brilliance of his music as opposed to the colour of his skin.

Activism and Politics

Recognition failed to diminish Samuel’s politics. During that period, he attended the First Pan African Conference in London where he made the acquaintance of the African American intellectual the renowned Du Bois and saw a variety of discussions, including on the subjugation of African people in South Africa. He was an activist throughout his life. He maintained ties with trailblazers for equality including Du Bois and the educator Washington, delivered his own speeches on racial equality, and even discussed racial problems with President Theodore Roosevelt on a trip to the presidential residence in 1904. Regarding his compositions, reminisced Du Bois, “he established his reputation so notably as a musician that it will endure.” He died in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. But what would Samuel have made of his child’s choice to travel to the African nation in the mid-20th century?

Issues and Stance

“Child of Celebrated Artist expresses approval to S African Bias,” declared a title in the Black American publication Jet magazine. Apartheid “appeared to me the correct approach”, Avril told Jet. When asked to explain, she qualified her remarks: she didn’t agree with the system “as a concept” and it “ought to be permitted to resolve itself, guided by good-intentioned South Africans of all races”. If Avril had been more in tune to her family’s principles, or raised in Jim Crow America, she could have hesitated about this system. However, existence had protected her.

Identity and Naivety

“I hold a English document,” she said, “and the government agents did not inquire me about my ethnicity.” Therefore, with her “fair” complexion (according to the magazine), she moved among the Europeans, supported by their admiration for her late father. She presented about her family’s work at the Cape Town university and conducted the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in Johannesburg, including the inspiring part of her concerto, subtitled: “In remembrance of my Father.” While a skilled pianist herself, she never played as the featured artist in her work. Instead, she consistently conducted as the maestro; and so the segregated ensemble played under her baton.

The composer aspired, in her own words, she “could introduce a shift”. Yet in the mid-1950s, things fell apart. After authorities became aware of her mixed background, she had to depart the land. Her citizenship offered no defense, the UK representative recommended her departure or risk imprisonment. She came home, deeply ashamed as the scale of her innocence dawned. “This experience was a painful one,” she lamented. Increasing her humiliation was the 1955 publication of her unfortunate magazine feature, a year after her sudden departure from the country.

A Familiar Story

While I reflected with these shadows, I perceived a known narrative. The narrative of being British until it’s revoked – which recalls troops of color who defended the UK throughout the global conflict and survived only to be refused rightful benefits. Including those from Windrush,